3a Assessment of Mental Health Problems
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d9d62b753
commit
0a68675810
183
PSYG2500 Abnormal Psychology/3a.md
Normal file
183
PSYG2500 Abnormal Psychology/3a.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
|
|||||||
|
# 3. Assessment of Mental Health Problems
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Introduction to Basic Elements in Assessment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Interaction of **Importance of trust and rapport** and **Impact on assessment** process.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Identification of presenting problem
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Situational or pervasive?
|
||||||
|
- Duration?
|
||||||
|
- Prior attempts to help or treat?
|
||||||
|
- Self-defeating or resourceful?
|
||||||
|
- How does problem impact social roles?
|
||||||
|
- Does problem match any DSM-5 disorder criteria?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Advantage of classification of presenting problem
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Treatment planning
|
||||||
|
- Knowledge of range of diagnostic problems
|
||||||
|
- Insurance payment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Good assessment includes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**social history noting:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Personality factors
|
||||||
|
- Social context
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**various professional orientations:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- May determine assessment techniques
|
||||||
|
- Does not limit clinician to one type of assessment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Dynamic formulation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Describes the current situation but also includes hypotheses about what is driving the person to behave in maladaptive ways.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Hypotheses about future behavior are derived.
|
||||||
|
- Decisions about treatment are made collaboratively with the consent and approval of the individual.
|
||||||
|
- Assessment may involve the coordinated use of physical, psychological, and environmental procedures.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Psychological Assessments are
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Reliable
|
||||||
|
- Valid
|
||||||
|
- Standardized
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Assessment of the Physical Conditions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### General physical examination
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Many psychological problems have physical components either as
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Causal factors
|
||||||
|
- Symptom patterns
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Neurological examination
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **EEG:** graphical record of brain’s electrical activity
|
||||||
|
- **CAT scan & MRI:** images of brain structures that may be damaged or diseased
|
||||||
|
- **PET scan:* metabolic activity of specific compounds
|
||||||
|
- **fMRI:** mapping psychological activity to specific regions in the brain
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Neuro-psychological examination
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Involves use of expanding array of testing devices
|
||||||
|
- Measures cognitive, perceptual, and motor performance
|
||||||
|
- Provides clues to extent and location of brain damage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery (HRNB) (10 tests in total):**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Halstead Category Test:** Learn & remember
|
||||||
|
- **Tactual Performance Test**: Motor function, response, tactile & kinesthetic cues
|
||||||
|
- **Rhythm Test:** Attention, sustained concentration
|
||||||
|
- **Speech Sounds Perception Test:** Identify spoken words
|
||||||
|
- **Finger Oscillation Task:** Speed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Psychosocial Assessment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Assessment Interviews
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Face-to-face interaction
|
||||||
|
- Structured interviews
|
||||||
|
- Unstructured interviews
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Clinical Observation of Behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Clinical observation in natural environments
|
||||||
|
- Clinical observations in therapeutic or medical settings
|
||||||
|
- Self-monitoring
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Psychological Tests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Intelligence tests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- WISC-IV(children); WAISIV (adults)
|
||||||
|
- Stanford-Binet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Personality tests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
##### Projective personality tests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Unstructured stimuli are presented
|
||||||
|
- Meaning or structure projected onto stimuli
|
||||||
|
- Projections reveal hidden motives
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Projective personality tests examples:**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Rorschach Inkblot Test
|
||||||
|
- Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
|
||||||
|
- Sentence Completion Test
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
##### Objective personality tests
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Examples: NEO-PI, MMPI-2
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Objective personality tests offer several advantages, such as standardization, efficiency, and ease of administration, but also have limitations, including limited depth, potential response distortion, and cultural bias.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The Integration of Assessment Data
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Developing integrated, coherent working model
|
||||||
|
- Utilizing individual or team approach
|
||||||
|
- Identifying definitive picture vs. discrepancie
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Ethical Issues in Assessment
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Potential cultural bias
|
||||||
|
- Theoretical orientation of clinician
|
||||||
|
- Underemphasis on external situation
|
||||||
|
- Insufficient validation
|
||||||
|
- Inaccurate data or premature evaluation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Classifying Abnormal Behavior
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Classification involves attempts to delineate meaningful sub-varieties of maladaptive behavior.
|
||||||
|
- Classification makes it possible to communicate about particular clusters of abnormal behavior in agreed-on and relatively precise ways.
|
||||||
|
- Classification of some kind is a necessary first step toward introducing order into our discussion of the nature, causes, and treatment of such behavior.
|
||||||
|
- Classification enables the clarification of insurance issues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Differing Models of Classification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Three basic approaches include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Categorical approach:
|
||||||
|
a patient is healthy or disordered, but there is no overlap
|
||||||
|
- Dimensional approach:
|
||||||
|
the patient may fall along a range from superior functioning
|
||||||
|
to absolutely impaired functioning
|
||||||
|
- Prototypal approach:
|
||||||
|
a conceptual entity depicts an idealized combination of
|
||||||
|
characteristics, some of which the patient may not have
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Formal Diagnostic Classification of Mental Disorders
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)
|
||||||
|
- International Classification of Disease (ICD-10)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Definition criteria based on:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Symptoms (subjective)
|
||||||
|
- Signs (objective)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### The DSM-5
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- More comprehensive and more subtypes of disorders
|
||||||
|
- Allows for gender related differences in diagnosis
|
||||||
|
- Provides structured interview regarding cultural influences
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Problem of diagnostic labeling
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Allows label capturing more than a behavioral pattern
|
||||||
|
- Creates assumptions among clinicians
|
||||||
|
- Creates social identity (stigma)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Diagnostic Interviews
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Unstructured:
|
||||||
|
- Freewheeling
|
||||||
|
- Clinician can follow leads
|
||||||
|
- Clinical picture may vary, based on interviewer
|
||||||
|
- Structured
|
||||||
|
- Controlled
|
||||||
|
- Determine if symptoms fit diagnostic criteria
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user